RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01915
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
CONGRESSIONAL INTEREST: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 4L (separated commissioning program) be
changed to RE-12 (recommended for reenlistment).
Examiners Note: Code RE-12 is not an Air Force reenlistment
eligibility code.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While he was indeed separated from a commissioning program, he
was highly recommended for reentry. His squadron commanders
comment on the USAFA IMT 34, 20050501, V1, Cadet Separation
Clearance/Referral, states Cadet J---- has my highest
recommendation. His group commander concurred with the
recommendation.
In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his DD
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
his USAF IMT 34, 20050501, V1 and honorable discharge
certificate.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 26 Jan 06, the applicant was honorably discharged from the
USAF Academy.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAFA/A1A makes no recommendation, but does not believe a
change to his DD Form 214 should be made. A1A states the Office
of the Under Secretary of Defense signed a memorandum on
18 Feb 2004 supporting the use of reenlistment eligibility codes
for former cadets. A1A notes the USAF Academy is a commissioning
program; therefore, RE-4L is the appropriate code.
A1A notes each accession source has documentation that can be
used to waive the 4L code and allow entry.
The complete A1A evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reiterates his earlier contentions and agrees that
based on standard procedure his RE code is correct. However,
are there not times that careful discernment and wise counsel
point to going outside of the guidance standard operating
procedures to benefit the agencies that defend our nation? He
is not requesting a correction to his RE code rather an
adjustment to another equally appropriate eligibility code.
He seeks entry in the United States Coast Guard. The Coast Guard
will not consider an applicant with a code of RE-3 or RE-4;
otherwise, he would apply for a waiver.
He has a great desire to serve his country.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. We note the
applicant requests an adjustment to another equally appropriate
RE code; however, as pointed by A1A, the RE code assigned is
appropriate and consistent with Air Force and DoD guidance. It
appears the applicants problem is that the Coast Guard is not
assigned to the Department of Defense. While regrettable the
applicant is encountering difficulties in his attempt to enter
the Coast Guard, there is no equally appropriate RE code this
Board can assign him. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 8 Mar 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2011-01915:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 May 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ USAFA/A1A, dated 29 Jun 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jul 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 29 Jul 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02117
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02117 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 27, Reentry Code be changed from 4L, which denotes Separated commissioning program eliminee (OTS, AECP, and so on) to a code suitable for reentry into the armed services...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04639
He believes he should have received an honorable discharge from the Academy due to his prior service and been allowed to complete his enlistment with ANG. The applicant received an honorable discharge from the ANG; however, his DD Form 214 only characterizes his service time as a basic cadet and not any previous service that he had already been separated. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01492
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01492 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAFA/A1A recommends denying the applicants request to change his RE code. The applicants attorney states the applicant did not have the right to counsel at his...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01751
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01751 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following blocks on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected: 1. He appealed his dismissal on 12 February 2007 and received his DD Form 214 from the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03219
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03219 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 Apr 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code be changed from 4L to a code that would allow him to continue his career in the US Air Force. Additionally, the Board also concluded the USAF Academy Cadet Sanctions...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03219
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03219 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 Apr 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code be changed from 4L to a code that would allow him to continue his career in the US Air Force. Additionally, the Board also concluded the USAF Academy Cadet Sanctions...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02323
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02323 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4L (Separated Commissioning Program Eliminee) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. Since the Air Force Academy is a commissioning program, this code is appropriate regardless of the reason for separation. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02733
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: During his time at the US Air Force Academy (USAFA), there were no adverse actions in his Cadet Personnel Record (CPR-II). He received an honorable discharge from the Air Force and was highly recommended for future officer training by both his Air Officer Commanding Officer and Group Commander when he left the USAFA. In addition, AFI 36-2012, Record of Disenrollment from Office Candidate Type...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02039
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02039 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was issued a DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States, upon graduation from the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). On 23 May 2012, an AF IMT 133, Oath of Office (Military Personnel) was initiated showing the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00900
On 15 October 2003, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-2020 for a pattern of misconduct with an RE code of “4L” which denotes “Separated Commissioning Program Eliminee.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 10 AMDS/CC recommends the requested relief be denied. All cadets disenrolling from Air Force Academy are given this RE code. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...